Introduction
Swan Chain, beforehand generally known as FilSwan, is a blockchain infrastructure platform devoted to bridging the hole between Web3 and AI. By leveraging OP Superchain expertise, it integrates storage, computing, bandwidth, and fee options right into a unified ecosystem. Its imaginative and prescient is accelerating AI adoption by establishing a decentralized AI computing market and supporting Web3 initiatives with scalable infrastructure.
Innovation
Swan Chain’s worth proposition lies in its decentralized AI computing market, democratizing entry to computational sources for AI coaching and deployment. Its Common Primary Revenue (UBI) mannequin for computing suppliers is a novel strategy, guaranteeing constant earnings streams and fostering sustained contributions. Moreover, ecosystem merchandise like MultiChain.storage for knowledge storage and the Lagrange platform for decentralized computing replicate its dedication to innovation.
Structure
Swan Chain’s protocol stack demonstrates a well-structured structure to attain scalability, effectivity, and decentralization.
- Consensus Layer: Helps contract execution and fee settlement.
- P2P Community: Enhances communication between nodes.
- Storage Layer: Integrates IPFS, Filecoin, Storj, and BNB GreenField for numerous storage wants.
- Computing Layer: Directs computational duties to specialised suppliers.
- Cost Channels: Facilitates low-cost, speedy transactions.
- Governance: Manages operational insurance policies, treasury allocation, and dispute decision.
The combination of Kubernetes with blockchain allows seamless orchestration, whereas zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs guarantee strong safety and privateness.
Code High quality
Though the precise codebase was not publicly audited for this assessment, Swan Chain employs fashionable improvement requirements, evident from its integration with ZK proofs, blockchain orchestration, and auction-based computing mechanisms. The modular design helps future enhancements and interoperability throughout chains, showcasing a forward-thinking strategy to code maintainability and scalability.
Product Roadmap
Swan Chain’s roadmap outlines its ambitions to redefine AI and Web3 by delivering safe, high-performance sources. Objectives embody:
- Scaling the decentralized AI computing market.
- Increasing cross-chain fee integrations.
- Advancing ZK public sale techniques for each storage and computing duties.
- These targets align with its broader mission of fostering a sustainable and equitable ecosystem.
Usability
The platform’s design prioritizes consumer accessibility whereas sustaining excessive sophistication for technical customers. Its auction-based activity allocation and popularity techniques simplify useful resource distribution, whereas multi-layered providers (e.g., storage and computing) cater to numerous use instances. Nevertheless, usability testing knowledge would offer additional insights into real-world adoption challenges.
Workforce
Whereas particulars concerning the group weren’t explicitly lined, the event and deployment of such a classy platform indicate a technically proficient and skilled group. Reviewing group backgrounds, public contributions, and affiliations would improve transparency.
Conclusion
Swan Chain is on the forefront of mixing AI and blockchain, providing a sturdy decentralized computing and storage platform. Its modern ZK public sale techniques, multi-chain fee help, and dedication to equitable computing markets make it a notable participant within the AI and Web3 panorama. Nevertheless, its success hinges on the sensible implementation of its bold roadmap and the adoption of its decentralized ecosystem by each suppliers and customers.
Swan Chain represents a promising imaginative and prescient, balancing innovation with utility, and stands poised to affect the way forward for AI and blockchain convergence.
Preliminary Screening | |||
Hold researching | |||
Does this venture want to make use of blockchain expertise? | Sure | ||
Can this venture be realized? | Sure | ||
Is there a viable use case for this venture? | Sure | ||
Is the venture shielded from generally identified assaults? | Sure | ||
Are there no careless errors within the whitepaper? | Sure | ||
Challenge Know-how Rating | |||
Description | Scorecard | ||
Innovation (Out Of 11) | 9 | ||
How have comparable initiatives carried out? | Good | 2 | |
Are there too many inventions? | Common | 2 | |
Share of crypto customers that may use the venture? | 6%-10% | 3 | |
Is the venture distinctive? | Sure | 2 | |
Structure (Out of 12) | 11 | ||
General feeling after studying whitepaper? | Good | 2 | |
Resistance to attainable assaults? | Good | 2 | |
Complexity of the structure? | Not too advanced | 2 | |
Time taken to grasp the structure? | 20-50 min | 1 | |
General feeling concerning the structure after deeper analysis? | Good | 4 | |
Has the venture been hacked? | No | 0 | |
Code High quality (out of 15) | 11 | ||
Is the venture open supply? | Sure | 2 | |
Does the venture use good code like C,C++, Rust, Erlang, Ruby, and so forth? | Sure | 2 | |
Might the venture use higher programming languages? | No | 0 | |
Github variety of traces? | Greater than 10K | 1 | |
Github commits per 30 days? | Greater than 10 | 2 | |
What’s the high quality of the code? | Good | 2 | |
How properly is the code commented? | Dangerous | 0 | |
General high quality of the check protection? | Good | 1 | |
General high quality of the maintainability index? | Good | 1 | |
When Mainnet (out of 5) | 5 | ||
When does the mainnet come out? | Mainnet | 5 | |
Usability for Infrastructure Initiatives (out of 5) | 3 | ||
Is it simple to make use of for the top buyer? | Sure | 3 | |
Workforce (out of seven) | 6 | ||
Variety of energetic builders? | 5+ | 2 | |
Builders common Git Background? | Senior | 2 | |
Builders coding fashion? | Stable | 2 | |
Complete Rating (out of 55) | 45 | ||
Share Rating | |||
Innovation | 16.36% | ||
Structure | 20.00% | ||
Code High quality | 20.00% | ||
Mainnet | 9.09% | ||
Usability | 5.45% | ||
Workforce | 10.91% | ||
Complete | 81.82% |