We’ve got the distinctive aggressive benefit right here on a pair fronts. Primary, we now have a really diversified jurisdictional and geographic management of the vault and personal key, proper? Nobody can compete with that, and that is essential, till we now have a harmonized international regulation. With out that, that is the foolproof setup. There isn’t any single level of failure. It is just about inconceivable for 3 totally different jurisdictions to collude if they do not prefer it. In order that’s primary. Quantity two, we strike the fitting steadiness between centralized and decentralized. The centralized ingredient is completely mandatory if you wish to develop an necessary strategic asset like wrapped bitcoin, if you wish to develop by scale, it’s important to have a trusted celebration to carry billions of multi billions, tens of billions of Bitcoin, proper? You can’t. I am personally not conscious of any decentralized challenge that may simply take away your bitcoin and say, belief me, it is all the time there, the minute you need it, it is all the time there. I’m personally not conscious of something like that. On the decentralized entrance, they are saying, belief me, proper? And simply depart your bitcoin with us, and there isn’t any accountability if one thing goes mistaken. These individuals do not even go by their actual names, proper? They go by every kind of unusual animal names. These days, I do know figuring out with the animal is kind of stylish within the U.S., proper? However no less than we go by our actual names. After which on the centralized aspect, in contrast with [Coinbase’s] cBTC, we’re not topic to a relentless subpoena by some authorities regulator, like within the case of Coinbase, proper? They may get the subpoena on any given time in relation to any property, any purchasers who onboard with CBTC, proper? We do not have that in Hong Kong, in Singapore. The regulation may be very totally different, very clear minimize, very totally different, proper?