Web3 is drowning in metrics, most of which paint an unclear image. Transaction volumes, token costs and flashy headlines typically masks what actually issues: the standard of consumer engagement and the potential for natural, exponential development. Because the trade strikes past the hype, dependable, data-driven indicators of success are now not non-obligatory — they’re important.
Right here’s the excellent news: the instruments to chop by means of the noise exist already. By combining a number of on-chain metrics right into a single “well being index” rating indicating the depth and high quality of general consumer engagement, we are able to determine which chains are actually thriving and poised for long-term development. With 2024 coming to an in depth, let’s dig into what these indicators reveal about at this time’s main chains, and what we are able to anticipate in 2025.
Assessing consumer high quality utilizing aggregated, not remoted, knowledge
When making a sustainable on-chain ecosystem, it doesn’t make sense to optimize any single consumer motion. What’s wanted is context — a technique to quantify not simply every thing customers are doing, however how and why it issues. One promising strategy to realize that is to mixture consumer behaviors into 5 core classes:
- Transaction Exercise, starting from spot trades to sensible contract interactions.
- Token Accumulation within the medium-to-long-term, and different “funding” behaviors.
- DeFi Engagement for actions like staking, lending and liquidity provision.
- NFT Exercise corresponding to minting, buying and selling and utility-driven interactions.
- Governance Participation to quantify DAO or protocol governance contributions.
Crucially, these metrics shouldn’t be handled equally. A greater strategy is to weigh and mix them utilizing a Bayesian mannequin to generate a single top-line “rating.” In contrast to conventional scoring programs that depend on static thresholds or easy averages, this lets us incorporate each prior data (what we anticipate from an “common” pockets) and new proof (precise exercise noticed on-chain). These dynamic, multi-variate scores are a lot more durable to sport and subsequently extra prone to reveal correct, actionable insights.
What the information tells us about 2024
The above strategy supplies a recent perspective on every chain’s consumer exercise by means of 2024. Let’s zoom in on a few of the extra stunning findings.
Solana (the highest mild blue line that peaks at ~2.75) attracted an enormous share of high-quality customers between February and mid-March, however engagement high quality has fallen since. Apparently, this downslide coincided with SOL’s first value and buying and selling quantity spike of 2024, and has continued by means of the present memecoin mania. Repetitive actions have diminishing returns when assessed utilizing a Bayesian mannequin, which means a number of token swaps yield smaller rating enhancements than engagement throughout a number of forms of actions, for any given pockets. This implies most Solana customers are presently engaged in a slender vary of on-chain actions that aren’t contributing to Solana’s multi-sector development.
As for Ethereum supporters (the underside orange line that begins at simply above 1) who anticipated this 12 months’s ETH ETFs to be a game-changer, the numbers paint a distinct image. Ethereum’s low and steady consumer rating by means of H1 2024 means that this 12 months’s bullish developments didn’t spur broader ecosystem participation corresponding to DeFi exercise and protocol governance.
It’s additionally price noting that Axelar (the darkish blue line that begins at 2.5) had probably the most lively customers throughout the broadest vary of on-chain actions relative to its whole consumer base, based on the information. Whereas Axelar is presently a lot smaller by TVL than the legacy chains dominating at this time’s headlines, that is an intriguing sign that warrants nearer inspection — and would have been missed if we had been market cap or buying and selling quantity alone.
The takeaway right here isn’t that Solana is doomed and Axelar will inevitably turn into the world’s largest chain. There may be restricted worth in evaluating a lot of these scores throughout chains, since every rating is proportional to the consumer high quality of its corresponding chain. In different phrases, a Solana consumer with a rating of “4” could also be very completely different from a “4” on Axelar, given the variations in every chain’s baseline exercise. As such, these scores are most helpful when monitoring modifications within the high quality of a sequence’s general consumer exercise over time, not cross-chain comparisons.
Predictions for 2025
With that mentioned, what does every chain’s consumer high quality observe file inform us about subsequent 12 months?
For starters, it’s clear that Solana faces important challenges and alternatives getting into 2025. The chain’s trajectory is dependent upon its means to retain its large informal consumer base and increase their vary of on-chain interactions. Failure to take action may end in a major stoop as soon as memecoins cool off — though knowledge from early 2024 suggests the chain has a big contingent of high quality customers that can endure no matter what occurs short-term.
2024 demonstrated Axelar’s means to draw a concentrated consumer base engaged in various, sustained on-chain actions, fairly than speculative surges. Now, Axelar’s problem can be upscaling its ecosystem with out diluting the standard of its consumer base. This may increasingly contain prioritizing high-profile partnerships to unlock new audiences whereas creating extra newbie-friendly onramps throughout its dApp ecosystem.
Ethereum’s fragmentation has shifted many lively customers to its quicker, cheaper L2 ecosystem, and so we may even see mainnet exercise more and more consolidate round core options protocol staking and governance. These actions are essential for the broader EVM ecosystem, however this trajectory could also be penalized by scoring programs that reward various on-chain engagement.
This dynamic underscores a problem for scoring programs: prioritizing wide-ranging consumer exercise can current an incomplete image when utilized to task-specific networks (or basic function chains which can be evolving into one thing extra specialised). In consequence, it’s necessary to obviously outline what success means for no matter chain is being evaluated and use a scoring system that captures the corresponding consumer actions.
A greater technique to outline, and drive, on-chain development
Web3 has spent too lengthy chasing the unsuitable metrics and failing to view the information in mixture. In 2025, the winners can be those that discover multivariate methods to measure — and act on — what issues most: consumer high quality.
By incorporating new scoring strategies into their dashboards, on-chain intelligence platforms can present extra significant insights to traders and trade observers. On the identical time, Web3 builders can use these scores to make clear prime priorities and drive consumer engagement and worth creation. Finally, this may assist your entire trade shift away from hype-driven narratives to data-backed methods that unlock the complete potential of Web3 in 2025 and past.